Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Phillip Hickox's avatar

Recently on F/B there are more and more topics appearing in my feed about "Women of History".

The trend is to portray women as being ignored or victimised.

Recent examples are a reel showing what happened to French female collaborators after WW11, as they had their heads shaved. Or the Suffragettes marching for the vote.

As usual, 1 in 3 or 1 in 4 women experience a lifetime instance of sexual violence/domestic violence/harassment.

Men who comment on these articles and challenge the narrative are immediately accused of "Hating Women", etc.

Stepping back, it seems to me that the increase in the publication of such articles is a new propaganda campaign to serve many purposes;

1) to stoke female rage

2) to bait men into responding

3) to justify the abuse of the male gender.

Brian Pinchback's avatar

How many men sacrificed their lives for their country in WW1 and WW2 ? My question applies not only to the U.K. if you get my drift. In France for example, it was acceptable for a married man to have a mistress due to the shortage of fertile men that resulted from two WWs. Which of the two sexes fought for their country in the greatest number and paid for it with their lives ? Obviously it was men !

And yet the feminists complain about misogyny. These female feminist fraudsters need to be exposed.

29 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?